When we had the option through the technology to look inside and to actually assess what is going on, is there pathology, is there something dynamic happening right now… rather than an auscultation of the lungs that might tell us that, ‘Oh, there’s something in there that maybe sounds a little bit wet, maybe sounds a little bit junky, maybe sounds a little bit coarse.’ It’s now the identification of pneumonia, the identification of pneumothorax with great confidence, great certainty. We’re talking about sensitivity and specificity levels that are 99 and 97%, on par with CT scan,”
